Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura has delivered a fierce assessment of President Donald J. Trump, arguing that America made a disastrous political choice when voters returned Trump to the White House. In a February 2026 interview, Ventura said voters faced what he described as a choice between the Constitution and “the criminal,” adding that the country ultimately chose the latter. His remarks have reignited debate over Trump’s criminal conviction, the 2024 election and the direction of American democracy.
Jesse Ventura, an independent who famously won Minnesota’s governorship without running as a traditional Republican or Democrat, has never been particularly famous for whispering his political opinions. This time, however, the former governor went considerably further, placing Trump’s criminal conviction at the heart of his argument and questioning how the country arrived at its current political moment.
Jesse Ventura Turns His Fire on Trump
Jesse Ventura’s criticism was unusually direct. During the interview, he argued that voters had a choice between the Constitution and what he called “the criminal,” before declaring that America had chosen the criminal. He then pointed specifically to Trump’s status as a convicted felon, making the president’s criminal conviction central to his criticism.
The remark immediately supplied political commentators with enough ammunition for several news cycles. In the satirical version of Washington’s reaction room, one could almost hear aides frantically asking whether Ventura had accidentally turned the political temperature knob past “maximum” and snapped it off.
Ventura’s criticism also reflects his broader opposition to Trump’s conduct surrounding January 6 and his concerns about constitutional limits on presidential power. In the same interview, Ventura argued that the events surrounding January 6 represented a serious attack on the constitutional order and criticized Trump’s role in the aftermath.
For Trump, the criticism comes from an especially recognizable political figure. Ventura is not simply a conventional partisan commentator; he previously governed Minnesota as an independent and built his national reputation as a professional wrestler, actor and political outsider. His outsider credentials have long been part of his appeal—and now they provide an unusually large microphone for his attack on the president.
The Convicted-Felon Argument Returns to the Political Spotlight
Trump’s legal history has remained a major part of America’s political debate. In 2024, he became the first former U.S. president convicted of felony crimes after a New York jury found him guilty on 34 counts in the hush-money case. Despite the conviction, Trump went on to win the 2024 presidential election and return to the White House. Ventura’s argument focuses heavily on that extraordinary political sequence.
That combination—conviction followed by a return to the presidency—is precisely what makes Ventura’s criticism so politically explosive. His argument is not simply about Trump’s legal record; it is about what the election result says about the priorities of American voters and the country’s constitutional system.
Jesse Ventura has therefore placed himself squarely back in the political conversation with a message that is difficult to misunderstand: he believes Trump’s return to power represents a dangerous departure from constitutional principles. Whether Americans agree with Ventura or Trump, the controversy illustrates just how deeply divided the country remains over the meaning of the 2024 election and the president’s record.
OGM News will continue following Jesse Ventura’s political attacks, Trump’s response and the broader debate over the president’s conviction, constitutional authority and place in American politics. With Ventura clearly showing no intention of lowering the volume, this story may have another political round waiting just around the corner.
[…] […]