President Donald J. Trump’s proposed 250-foot gilded triumphal arch is moving closer to becoming a very expensive reality, with the administration announcing that excavation at Memorial Circle will begin within the next two weeks — apparently because nothing says “historic preservation” quite like bringing in excavators. The towering project, designed to stand between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery, remains embroiled in a legal challenge and has yet to receive final approval from the National Capital Planning Commission.
THE ARCH THAT WANTS TO BE THE STAR OF WASHINGTON
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has promoted the project as a spectacular addition to the capital, describing it as one of the “Great Pieces of American Architecture.” The proposed structure would rise roughly 250 feet, feature extensive gold detailing, golden eagles and a winged, torch-carrying figure on top, while carrying the inscription “ONE NATION UNDER GOD.” In other words, Washington apparently needed an architectural object large enough to make tourists wonder whether they had accidentally entered a presidential gift shop.
Trump’s administration argues that the arch would commemorate America’s 250th anniversary and honor veterans, while Burgum has pointed to historical discussions dating back more than a century as justification for finally giving the traffic circle its monumental moment. Trump has also described the proposed structure as potentially the world’s largest triumphal arch, putting it well above Paris’s Arc de Triomphe in height.
HISTORIC SIGHTLINES MEET A VERY LARGE PROBLEM
The trouble is that Washington’s monumental landscape was not arranged randomly. The carefully planned views connecting landmarks such as the Lincoln Memorial, Arlington House and the surrounding memorial landscape carry historical symbolism. A National Park Service assessment supports the project but acknowledges that the arch would have adverse effects on historic sightlines and the significance of nearby sites. Satirically speaking, the administration appears to have discovered the ultimate Washington solution: if a historic view is inconvenient, build something taller in front of it.
The legal fight is therefore marching alongside the construction plans. Three veterans and an architectural historian, represented by Public Citizen Litigation Group, argue that congressional authorization is required for the project. The Justice Department, meanwhile, has asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit. The case is pending before U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, while the administration’s excavation timetable has added another layer of urgency to a dispute that now involves history, architecture, congressional authority and a very large hole in the ground.
Trump’s arch is also part of a much broader effort to reshape Washington, including a new White House ballroom, changes involving the Kennedy Center, work on the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and redevelopment of East Potomac Park’s golf course. With so many landmark projects underway or proposed, Washington may soon need a separate monument just to commemorate the era when monuments were being renovated, renamed, rebuilt and challenged in court at the same time.
For now, the great excavation countdown is on. Whether the first shovel of earth becomes the beginning of a spectacular national memorial or merely the opening scene in another lengthy Washington courtroom drama remains to be decided. What is certain is that the proposed arch has become far more than a construction project: it is now a clash between presidential ambition, historic preservation and questions over legal authority. OGM News will continue watching the courtroom, the construction site and, presumably, the gold-plated skyline for future developments.
[…] […]