Kristi Noem has alleged that employees within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) “spied” on her by installing unauthorized software on her personal devices, raising serious questions about internal oversight and agency stability.
Kristi Noem made the claims during an appearance on a podcast hosted by Patrick Bet-David, where she stated that shortly after assuming office, she discovered spyware had allegedly been downloaded onto her phone and laptop to record meetings and monitor communications.
Kristi Noem further asserted that technology entrepreneur Elon Musk and his team were instrumental in identifying the suspected surveillance software, describing their assistance as “extremely helpful” during her early days leading the agency.
Allegations of Spyware and Internal Sabotage
Kristi Noem claimed that DHS staff had installed software designed to record meetings and gather information without her knowledge or authorization.
She stated that the alleged activity amounted to internal sabotage at the highest levels of the agency.
Kristi Noem said several employees were questioned, subjected to polygraph examinations, and ultimately dismissed following internal reviews. She indicated that these actions were taken to restore integrity and confidence within her office.
Kristi Noem also revealed that her office now conducts routine electronic sweeps for listening devices, underscoring what she described as persistent concerns about internal vulnerabilities within the department.
Discovery of a “Secret File Room”
Kristi Noem stated that her team uncovered what she described as a “secret file room” containing classified documents. She noted that the materials have since been transferred to legal counsel for further review.
Kristi Noem did not provide additional details regarding the contents of the documents or how the room was discovered, leaving questions about the scope and potential implications of the finding.
Kristi Noem emphasized that safeguarding classified information remains a top priority under her leadership, particularly in light of the allegations she has raised.
Musk’s Role and Questions of Oversight
Kristi Noem credited Elon Musk with assisting in identifying what she described as suspicious software activity. She portrayed the involvement of the private-sector executive as a necessary step to uncover potential misconduct within her department.
Kristi Noem did not clarify the formal capacity in which Musk and his team reviewed the devices, nor did she specify whether DHS cybersecurity personnel were involved in the same process.
Kristi Noem’s account has prompted broader questions about protocols governing outside technical assistance within federal agencies, particularly when classified systems or sensitive communications may be involved.
Absence of Public Evidence
Kristi Noem has not released technical reports, forensic analyses, or internal investigative findings to substantiate the claims. No confirmation has been issued by DHS oversight bodies, including the Office of Inspector General.
Noem’s allegations, while serious, remain unverified in the public domain. Cybersecurity experts note that cases involving unauthorized surveillance typically result in formal documentation and, where appropriate, criminal investigation.
Kristi Noem’s statements have intensified calls from lawmakers and analysts for transparency, particularly given the national security responsibilities of the agency she leads.
Broader Implications for DHS Leadership
Kristi Noem’s remarks come at a time when the Department of Homeland Security plays a central role in addressing border security, cyber threats, and counterterrorism efforts.
Noem’s allegations, if substantiated, could signal internal structural or cultural challenges within DHS. Conversely, if not supported by evidence, they may raise concerns about communication and internal management practices.
Noem’s claims are unfolding during the second term of President Donald Trump, placing additional political and institutional focus on how the matter will be addressed moving forward.
