Joe DiGenova’s resignation from the Justice Department investigation into an alleged conspiracy against President Donald Trump has suddenly turned a politically explosive probe into an even bigger question mark. The longtime Trump ally confirmed on September 10 that he had resigned from the position overseeing the South Florida-based investigation, after months of subpoenas, interviews and escalating scrutiny of officials involved in earlier investigations of Trump.
Trump’s Alleged Conspiracy Investigation Suffers Another Shock as DiGenova Walks Away
DiGenova, an 81-year-old former U.S. attorney and longtime Trump ally, was brought into the investigation in April after career prosecutor Maria Medetis Long was removed from the case following reported concerns about its direction. The probe was examining whether former law enforcement and intelligence officials had improperly conspired against Trump, including through actions connected to the 2016 Russia investigation and later investigations involving the president.
The resignation comes at an awkward moment for a conspiracy investigation that had been under pressure to produce results. Recent reporting indicates that investigators had issued new grand jury subpoenas and sought interviews with former FBI personnel connected to the 2022 search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property. Yet the investigation had not produced criminal charges, despite the breadth of the allegations and the passage of roughly a year since the broader inquiry began.
The Investigation Targeting Trump’s Foes Just Lost the Man Chosen to Drive It Forward
The conspiracy inquiry is considerably broader than a single dispute over the 2016 election. Investigators have examined the intelligence assessment concerning Russian interference in the 2016 election, actions surrounding investigations of Trump, the retention of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago and other matters that Trump and his allies have characterized as politically motivated attacks. Some Trump allies have hoped the investigation could ultimately implicate former officials including former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey and former special counsel Jack Smith.
But allegations are not findings, and the legal distinction matters. Previous investigations into the Trump-Russia matter, including the Mueller investigation, did not establish a criminal conspiracy between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia. Brennan and other officials who have come under scrutiny have denied wrongdoing, while legal experts have questioned whether the wide range of events being examined can realistically be assembled into one prosecutable conspiracy case.
DiGenova’s departure therefore leaves the conspiracy investigation facing an unusual credibility and leadership test: whether it can continue producing legally sustainable evidence without its latest high-profile overseer. His resignation does not itself prove that the allegations are false, nor does it establish that wrongdoing occurred; it simply adds another major personnel disruption to an already controversial investigation. OGM News will continue watching for developments involving new leadership, possible charges, grand jury activity and the broader legal battle over how far the Justice Department can pursue allegations against Trump’s former investigators and perceived political opponents.
[…] […]