Precious Adeboyejo – OGM News

Mary Trump Says There Was “Nothing Positive” About Her Family, Delivering Another Brutal Verdict on the Trump Dynasty

Precious Adeboyejo — Mon, 14 Sep 2026 18:44:11 +0000

Mary Trump has once again offered an unflinching account of her experience growing up in the Trump family, describing the environment as one in which she saw little affection, compassion or empathy. In a November 2025 interview, Donald Trump’s niece said there was “no upside” to being part of the family and characterized its members as cruel and selfish. Her comments provide another glimpse into the deeply fractured relationship between Mary Trump and the family of President Donald J. Trump.

Mary Trump has spent years publicly discussing her family history, including her experiences as the daughter of Fred Trump Jr., Donald Trump’s older brother. Her latest comments continue a long-running public dispute over the family’s legacy, with Mary presenting a starkly different picture from the powerful public image associated with the Trump name.

Mary Trump Gives Her Family Legacy Another Harsh Review

Mary Trump has previously written and spoken extensively about the family dynamics she experienced while growing up. During the interview, she described an environment dominated by money, power and what she viewed as a lack of emotional warmth. She also said she felt largely overlooked within the family because she was her father’s daughter and a girl.

In satirical Washington fashion, the Trump family reunion invitation department may now need to consider a completely new category: “Guests who have written books about why they are glad they left.” Somewhere between the family photographs and political headlines, Mary Trump has made clear that she wants very little to do with the dynasty she was born into.

Mary Trump Says Leaving the Family Was a Blessing

Mary Trump said she considers herself extremely lucky not to be part of the family today. Her comments contrast sharply with the wealth, political influence and international recognition surrounding the Trump name, suggesting that the benefits of belonging to a famous family can look very different from the inside.

The remarks also underline the extraordinary split within the broader Trump family. While Donald Trump remains the current president and one of the most powerful figures in American politics, Mary has built her public profile largely by offering criticism and personal reflections about the family from which she has distanced herself.

Mary latest assessment is unlikely to end the long-running debate over the Trump family’s history, particularly as she continues to speak publicly about her experiences. Whether future comments reveal more about the family’s private dynamics remains to be seen. OGM News will continue following the story and the latest developments surrounding Mary Trump and the Trump family.

Trump Declares He Always Keeps His Pledges as Political Promise Tracker Gets a Fresh Workout

Precious Adeboyejo — Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:43:00 +0000

President Donald J. Trump has once again put his reputation for keeping political promises on the public record, declaring that he “always” keeps his pledges. The sweeping statement has naturally attracted attention in Washington, where campaign promises have a remarkable habit of becoming much easier to remember during rallies than after Election Day. For Trump, however, the message is clear: he wants voters to judge his presidency by the promises he says he has delivered.

The declaration comes as he continues to make his political agenda a central part of his second administration. From immigration and trade to government spending and foreign policy, the president has repeatedly presented his record as evidence that he is fulfilling the commitments that brought him back to the White House. Supporters see that as consistency; critics remain eager to produce their own scorecard.

Trump Puts His Pledges on the Political Scoreboard

Trump’s claim places his pledges directly at the centre of the political conversation. His supporters have long viewed his willingness to make ambitious promises—and attempt to act on them—as one of his defining political characteristics. His critics, meanwhile, argue that promises should be measured against measurable results rather than presidential declarations.

In satirical Washington fashion, the nation’s political fact-checkers may soon require an additional calculator, a filing cabinet and several strong cups of coffee. Every new Trump pledge appears to arrive with its own debate over whether it has been fulfilled, partially fulfilled, delayed or placed somewhere in the mysterious political drawer labelled “coming soon.”

Promise-Keeping Claim Faces the Voter Test

Trump’s assertion also highlights one of the oldest rules of politics: eventually, voters get to compare what was promised with what actually happened. Presidential pledges can involve executive action, legislation, negotiations and decisions that take years to produce measurable results, making simple yes-or-no scorecards difficult.

That complexity has not stopped either side from keeping score. Trump and his allies can point to policies they regard as fulfilled, while opponents can point to promises they believe remain incomplete or have produced different results from those advertised. Somewhere between both sides sits the American voter, armed with a ballot and an increasingly long list of promises to remember.

Whether Trump’s claim that he always keeps his pledges withstands continued scrutiny will ultimately depend on how voters evaluate his record and the promises still before him. OGM News will continue following Trump’s pledges, presidential actions and the political debate surrounding them, so readers should watch for future updates as America’s unofficial promise scoreboard continues to grow.

Steven Sumner Sentenced to 30 Years After Guilty Plea in Child Sex Crimes Case

Precious Adeboyejo — Sun, 13 Sep 2026 19:10:39 +0000

Former Republican Madison County councilman Steven Sumner has been sentenced to 30 years in prison after pleading guilty to multiple child sex crimes, bringing a long-running criminal case to a dramatic conclusion. Sumner, who once served as an elected official and pastor in Indiana, admitted to offenses involving a girl under 16, including providing her with alcohol and sexually abusing her. The case has now ended with a sentence that will keep the former politician behind bars for decades.

The case has attracted particular attention because Sumner did not simply disappear from politics after the allegations emerged—he also became a fugitive after failing to appear for court proceedings in 2023. U.S. Marshals eventually captured him near Winchester, Kentucky, in September 2025 after more than two years on the run.

Steven Sumner’s Political Career Ends in a Criminal Conviction

Steven Sumner was serving his second term on the Madison County Council when authorities arrested him in December 2020. At the time, investigators said a girl younger than 16 had reported that Sumner gave her alcohol and engaged in sexual acts with her. Investigators also reported finding more than 100 images of potential child pornography on his devices.

Sumner eventually resigned from the council in May 2021, saying he was unable to provide constituents with the representation they deserved. His political career was therefore already over long before the 30-year sentence arrived, leaving a stark reminder that elected office provides no exemption from accountability when serious criminal allegations become convictions.

A Fugitive’s Long Road to a 30-Year Sentence

The case took another extraordinary turn when Sumner failed to appear for court in 2023. Authorities subsequently issued a warrant, and the U.S. Marshals Service launched a search for him. In September 2025, investigators located him in Kentucky and arrested him without incident.

Now, after the guilty plea and sentencing, the long-running pursuit has reached its legal conclusion with a 30-year prison term. The case also raises broader questions about how a public official facing such serious accusations was able to remain free long enough to become a fugitive. Satirically speaking, the only “campaign” Sumner is now expected to run is one measured in prison years—not votes.

The Steven Sumner case has ended with a substantial prison sentence after years of investigation, criminal proceedings and a period on the run. The facts underscore the importance of protecting children, taking allegations of abuse seriously and ensuring that the justice system can hold even former public officials accountable. OGM News will continue following any further developments surrounding Steven Sumner and the case.

Cher’s Explosive Trump Attack Resurfaces as Her Warning About America Goes Viral Again

Precious Adeboyejo — Sun, 13 Sep 2026 01:00:00 +0000

Cher’s is once again at the centre of an online political storm after her blistering 2016 criticism of Donald Trump resurfaced, with the singer describing the Republican politician as an “idiot” and “incredibly dangerous” while accusing him of awakening bigotry and distrust in America. The remarks were made before Trump won the presidency and have recently circulated again across social media, prompting renewed interest in Cher’s long-running opposition to the president.

The resurfaced comments have provided the internet with an unusual political time machine: a statement made nearly a decade ago has suddenly returned to the news cycle as though somebody pressed the replay button. Cher’s assessment was unmistakably harsh, but her broader warning focused on what she believed Trump’s political rise could unleash within American society.

Cher’s Warning Returns to the Political Spotlight

Cher has never exactly been known for whispering her political opinions. During the 2016 election campaign, she repeatedly criticized Trump, and her remarks at the One Young World event in Ottawa became one of her more widely circulated attacks. She argued that Trump represented a dangerous political force and linked his rise to concerns about bigotry, distrust and supremacy.

In classic Cher fashion, subtlety apparently did not make the guest list. Her language was direct, emotional and unmistakably hostile toward Trump, ensuring that the remarks would have little difficulty surviving the internet’s attention span. Nearly ten years later, social media users have apparently decided that the old political ammunition still has enough fuel left to fire another round.

Cher and Trump Remain Political Opposites

Cher’s criticism of Trump did not begin or end with that 2016 appearance. She had already attacked Trump publicly during the 2015 presidential campaign, criticizing his political style and personality, while later describing his rhetoric as threatening to values she considered important.

Trump and Cher have therefore spent years occupying opposite ends of the celebrity-political battlefield. While Trump built his political movement around his own highly recognizable brand and rhetoric, Cher became one of his more outspoken celebrity critics. Their feud has survived elections, social-media arguments and political seasons with the determination of a television series that refuses to air its final episode.

The resurfacing of Cher’s comments illustrates how political statements from the Trump era can suddenly regain attention years after they were originally made. Whether readers agree with Cher’s assessment or not, the remarks remain part of the long-running public debate surrounding Trump’s political influence and the social divisions that accompanied his rise. OGM News will continue watching the renewed conversation as old political battles find new audiences online.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani Draws a Hard Line on ICE as New York City Tightens Access to City Property

Precious Adeboyejo — Sat, 12 Sep 2026 19:00:00 +0000

Mayor Zohran Mamdani has strengthened New York City’s restrictions on federal immigration enforcement, reaffirming that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents cannot enter city property without a judicial warrant. The policy covers locations including schools, shelters and hospitals and forms part of Mamdani’s broader effort to reinforce New York City’s sanctuary-city protections.

The move puts Mayor Zohran Mamdani at the centre of another confrontation between City Hall and the federal government over immigration enforcement. Mamdani has argued that protecting immigrant New Yorkers and protecting public safety are compatible goals, while his administration has also ordered city agencies to strengthen procedures for dealing with federal immigration authorities.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani Makes City Property a Legal Line in the Sand

Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s February executive order reaffirmed that ICE would not be permitted to enter New York City property without a judicial warrant signed by a judge. The administration specifically cited schools, shelters, hospitals and other city facilities as places where the policy applies.

In classic New York fashion, City Hall has essentially put a new sign on the door: federal badge, impressive paperwork and all, but please bring the judge’s signature. Satirically speaking, ICE agents may soon discover that the fastest route through City Hall is not confidence, but a properly completed legal document.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani Expands the City’s Immigration Enforcement Safeguards

The policy is not limited to simply keeping federal agents outside the door. Mamdani’s administration has also conducted a citywide audit of agency procedures and introduced measures requiring stronger coordination when federal immigration authorities are present. The city said the changes were intended to ensure agencies comply with sanctuary laws and protect residents’ privacy.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani has also launched a “Know Your Rights” campaign, distributing tens of thousands of multilingual guides explaining legal rights during encounters with federal immigration authorities. The administration says the effort is intended to help both immigrants and citizens understand what they can legally do during an enforcement encounter.

The confrontation over immigration enforcement therefore remains larger than a simple question of who gets through a city-property doorway. Mayor Zohran Mamdani has made the policy a defining part of his administration’s approach to immigrant protections, while federal authorities retain their own enforcement responsibilities. OGM News will continue watching the dispute between City Hall and federal immigration authorities as the policy develops, because the next encounter between local rules and federal power could produce another major chapter in this story.

Chris Christie Says Trump’s Mueller Reaction Revealed a Self-Consumed President as Political Feud Takes Dark Turn

Precious Adeboyejo — Fri, 11 Sep 2026 19:03:41 +0000

Chris Christie has delivered a blistering assessment of President Donald J. Trump’s reaction to the death of former FBI Director Robert Mueller, arguing that Trump’s remarks revealed an extraordinary degree of self-absorption. Christie said Trump’s response was “reprehensible” and suggested that it reflected a belief that his own interests were the centre of the universe. The comments came after Trump publicly reacted to Mueller’s death by saying he was glad the former FBI director could no longer hurt innocent people.

The clash is particularly notable because Christie was not merely commenting on a distant political figure. He had worked alongside Mueller for seven years as U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey and acknowledged that the two men had disagreed over important matters. Christie nevertheless said Mueller had demonstrated a strong commitment to public service, including his military service in Vietnam.

Chris Christie Turns Personal Experience With Mueller Into a Rebuke of Trump

Chris Christie argued that Trump’s response could not simply be dismissed as another political disagreement. He pointed to Mueller’s decorated military service and decades of public service, saying that whatever disagreements existed between them, Mueller had repeatedly answered his country’s call to serve. Christie’s criticism therefore went beyond the former special counsel’s investigation of Trump.

In the satirical Washington version of events, the political argument appears to have reached a point where even death could not convince America’s political machinery to take a day off. Mueller’s career may have ended years ago, but apparently the old Trump-Mueller storyline still had enough fuel left to power another news cycle.

Trump’s Mueller History Returns to the Political Spotlight

Mueller became one of the most politically significant figures surrounding Trump’s first presidency after being appointed special counsel to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and related matters. Christie had previously defended Mueller’s integrity, even while offering Trump legal and political advice about whether he should sit for an interview with the special counsel.

That history helps explain why Christie’s latest criticism carried particular weight. He was familiar with Mueller personally, had disagreed with him professionally, and still distinguished those disagreements from what he considered Mueller’s record of service. Christie ultimately argued that Trump’s reaction demonstrated an unusually intense focus on himself.

The episode has therefore revived an old political conflict in an unusually grim setting, with Chris Christie challenging the president’s response while reminding Americans of Mueller’s military and public-service record. OGM News will continue following the political fallout surrounding Trump, Christie and the continuing debate over Mueller’s legacy, so readers should watch for future developments as this latest chapter unfolds.

Trump’s 106,789-Claim Figure Faces a Fact-Check of Its Own as His Record of Falsehoods Comes Under Scrutiny

Precious Adeboyejo — Fri, 11 Sep 2026 01:00:00 +0000

President Donald J. Trump has long faced scrutiny over the accuracy of his public statements, but a new claim circulating online puts his alleged total at a staggering 106,789 false statements—an average of 210 every day. There is, however, a problem with that number: the best-documented major tally does not support it. A comprehensive database compiled during Trump’s first presidential term recorded 30,573 false or misleading claims, averaging about 21 per day.

That distinction has not stopped the larger figure from attracting attention. If nothing else, the claim has demonstrated that numbers can apparently enter American political discourse, put on a suit, and demand their own press conference. But while the satire writes itself, the underlying record is serious: Trump’s first-term statements were tracked extensively, with the frequency of claims increasing dramatically during his presidency.

Trump’s Record Has Already Produced a Remarkable Number of False Claims

Trump’s documented first-term record is substantial. The fact-checking database found that he averaged about six false or misleading claims per day during his first year, rising to 16 in his second, 22 in his third and approximately 39 per day in his final year. By the end of his four-year term, the tally had reached 30,573.

In other words, Trump did not exactly have a quiet relationship with fact-checkers. The database grew from a 100-day project into a four-year catalogue containing thousands of claims, with researchers and journalists examining statements across subjects ranging from elections and immigration to economics and foreign policy.

The 106,789 Figure Raises More Questions Than Answers

The much larger figure of 106,789 would represent more than three times the established first-term tally, while 210 claims per day would be roughly ten times the documented first-term average. Without a transparent methodology showing how that number was calculated, it should be treated as an unverified claim rather than established fact.

That does not erase Trump’s documented record. Academic researchers have independently used the 30,573-claim database in studies examining political misinformation and repeated false claims, demonstrating that the underlying dataset has considerable research value.

For now, the most defensible headline is not that Trump made 106,789 lies, but that an enormous new figure is circulating without the evidence needed to substantiate it. The verified historical record is already extraordinary enough without adding numbers that cannot be properly traced. OGM News will continue watching the claims, the fact-checks and the political reaction, because apparently even the numbers now need fact-checking before they can enter the political arena.

Stephen King Tells Trump to Forget the UFO Files and Release the Epstein Files Instead

Precious Adeboyejo — Thu, 10 Sep 2026 19:00:00 +0000

American author Stephen King has delivered a blunt message to President Donald J. Trump after the administration’s release of government files concerning unidentified flying objects: forget the aliens and release the Epstein files. King’s remark quickly became part of the wider debate over government transparency, as the administration’s UFO disclosure effort collided with continued public demands for greater access to records connected to Jeffrey Epstein.

The timing gave King’s comment an unusually simple political punchline. While Washington was busy asking whether mysterious objects in the sky might finally have an explanation, King appeared to be asking why the government was not giving equal attention to documents concerning a much more earthly controversy. And judging by the continuing debate, the Epstein files are nowhere near disappearing from the national conversation.

Stephen King Turns UFO Disclosure Into an Epstein Question

Stephen King, one of America’s best-known authors, has frequently used social media to criticize Trump. After the administration released its first batch of UFO-related documents in May, King posted the now widely circulated message urging Trump to prioritize the Epstein files instead.

The timing was almost tailor-made for satire. Washington had just opened another chapter of its UFO mystery, and Stephen King essentially walked into the conversation with the literary equivalent of a red pen: “Interesting aliens, but perhaps we should finish the previous mystery first.” Somewhere, a government communications officer was probably wondering whether the White House needed a new department called the Bureau of Uncomfortable Questions.

Stephen King Keeps Pressure on the Epstein Files Debate

The Epstein controversy remains active despite the government’s release of a huge volume of records. The Justice Department maintains an online Epstein Library containing documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, while recent reporting indicates that additional pages have continued to emerge and that disputes remain over redactions and access to certain records.

Stephen King is hardly the only person demanding transparency. Survivors, activists, lawmakers and other commentators have continued to argue over what should be released and how extensively documents should be redacted to protect victims and private individuals. The debate is therefore considerably larger than one celebrity’s social-media post.

For Trump, the controversy creates an unusual communications challenge: the administration can discuss UFOs, but the Epstein files continue to generate questions that are considerably closer to Washington’s political ground. Stephen King’s intervention ensured that the two subjects would be discussed side by side, giving the internet yet another opportunity to turn government transparency into a national guessing game. OGM News will continue following Stephen King, the Trump administration and developments surrounding the Epstein files as further documents and official responses emerge.

Pritzker Accuses Republicans of Trying to Rig 2026 Election as Illinois Race Heats Up

Precious Adeboyejo — Thu, 10 Sep 2026 01:00:00 +0000

Gov. JB Pritzker has launched a fierce attack on Republicans, accusing them of attempting to manipulate the rules of the 2026 election because, in his view, they cannot defeat Democrats on the merits of their policies. Pritzker described the alleged effort as a “disgraceful attack,” adding another explosive chapter to an increasingly bitter election season. The Illinois governor is seeking a third term, while Republicans are hoping to break Democrats’ long-standing grip on statewide power.

The accusation comes as election rules, congressional redistricting and political power have become major battlegrounds across the country. Illinois itself has been drawn into the redistricting fight, with Democrats considering new maps after changes in federal voting-rights law, while Republicans have criticized the process and called for an independent redistricting commission.

Pritzker Turns Up the Heat on Republicans

Pritzker’s warning arrives at a particularly competitive moment for Illinois politics. Republicans have not won the Illinois governor’s mansion since 2014, hold no statewide elected office and currently possess only a small share of the state’s congressional delegation. Their candidates nevertheless argue that high costs, taxes and dissatisfaction with Democratic leadership could create an opening in 2026.

Pritzker, however, sees the contest differently. From his perspective, if Republicans cannot persuade voters with their policies, changing the rules becomes the political equivalent of asking the referee to move the goalposts. Satirically speaking, Springfield may soon need a rulebook for the rulebook, just in case somebody tries to redraw that too.

Election Maps Become the Latest Political Battlefield

The fight is not occurring in a vacuum. Illinois Democrats have explored mid-cycle redistricting following a Supreme Court ruling affecting the Voting Rights Act, while Republicans have accused Democrats of using their legislative majority to protect their political advantage. A proposed Illinois constitutional amendment concerning redistricting was referred back to the Rules Committee in July.

The result is a familiar American political spectacle: both parties insisting they are defending democracy while simultaneously examining the electoral map with the enthusiasm of people rearranging furniture in a room they intend to own. Pritzker says Republicans are trying to rig the election; Republicans, meanwhile, have their own complaints about how political power is being exercised in Illinois.

The 2026 Illinois gubernatorial contest is therefore shaping up as more than another contest between Pritzker and Republican nominee Darren Bailey. It is also becoming a broader argument over election rules, redistricting, political power and whether voters—or politicians—should have the greater influence over the shape of the next political map. OGM News will continue following Pritzker’s accusations, the Republican response and the developing election battle as November approaches.

Jon Ossoff Turns Mike Collins’ Social Security Remark Into a Georgia Senate Showdown

Precious Adeboyejo — Wed, 09 Sep 2026 19:00:00 +0000

Jon Ossoff’s campaign has placed Social Security at the centre of the Georgia Senate race after resurfacing a 2025 remark by Republican challenger Mike Collins in which Collins said it should become more advantageous for people to “get off of Medicaid, get off of Social Security, get back into the workforce.” Ossoff’s campaign has turned the clip into a major attack line, portraying Collins as wanting to push Americans off Social Security and back to work.

The political fireworks come with an important footnote: fact-checkers say the short clip leaves out surrounding context. Collins was discussing President Donald Trump’s tax cuts and arguing that lowering taxes could make working more attractive; he did not explicitly propose forcing Social Security recipients back into employment. Still, the wording has given Ossoff a remarkably potent political weapon in a state where older voters are paying close attention to the program.

Jon Ossoff has repeatedly used the Collins quotation in television advertising, including an ad that plays the disputed phrase more than once. FactCheck.org reported that Ossoff’s campaign had spent more than $2.8 million on the advertisement since it began airing in August. The campaign says its message does not claim Collins would literally use force to remove people from Social Security, but instead argues that his comments reveal a policy preference.

For Ossoff, the strategy is politically understandable. Social Security is an unusually powerful issue among older voters, and a July AARP poll found that voters aged 50 and older ranked Social Security among their leading concerns. The same poll found Ossoff ahead overall but Collins holding an advantage among older voters—making every sentence about retirement benefits potentially worth its weight in campaign advertisements.

Jon Ossoff Faces a Republican Opponent With a Remark That Won’t Disappear

Collins’ original comments were made while defending Trump’s tax-cut legislation and arguing that tax policy could encourage people to work. His statement referred to both Medicaid and Social Security, making the precise meaning of the Social Security portion a subject of political and media debate. Fact-checkers concluded that Ossoff’s presentation of the quote omitted important context.

Satirically speaking, Georgia’s Senate race has now reached the stage where a single sentence from a year-old radio interview can be resurrected, given a campaign soundtrack and sent back into the political bloodstream. Somewhere in Georgia, an exhausted campaign staffer is probably listening to the same seven seconds of audio for the 900th time and wondering whether anyone remembers the rest of the interview.

Jon Ossoff and Mike Collins are therefore heading toward an increasingly expensive and closely watched Senate contest in which Social Security could remain a major dividing line. The controversy illustrates how a politician’s words can acquire an entirely new life once they enter a campaign advertisement. OGM News will continue following the Georgia Senate race, the Social Security debate and the next political twist, because this particular sound bite appears nowhere near ready for retirement.

Precious Adeboyejo – OGM News

Mary Trump Says There Was “Nothing Positive” About Her Family, Delivering Another Brutal Verdict on the Trump Dynasty

Mary Trump Gives Her Family Legacy Another Harsh Review

Mary Trump Says Leaving the Family Was a Blessing

Table of Contents

Trump Declares He Always Keeps His Pledges as Political Promise Tracker Gets a Fresh Workout

Trump Puts His Pledges on the Political Scoreboard

Promise-Keeping Claim Faces the Voter Test

Table of Contents

Steven Sumner Sentenced to 30 Years After Guilty Plea in Child Sex Crimes Case

Steven Sumner’s Political Career Ends in a Criminal Conviction

A Fugitive’s Long Road to a 30-Year Sentence

Table of Contents

Cher’s Explosive Trump Attack Resurfaces as Her Warning About America Goes Viral Again

Cher’s Warning Returns to the Political Spotlight

Cher and Trump Remain Political Opposites

Table of Contents

Mayor Zohran Mamdani Draws a Hard Line on ICE as New York City Tightens Access to City Property

Mayor Zohran Mamdani Makes City Property a Legal Line in the Sand

Mayor Zohran Mamdani Expands the City’s Immigration Enforcement Safeguards

Table of Contents

Chris Christie Says Trump’s Mueller Reaction Revealed a Self-Consumed President as Political Feud Takes Dark Turn

Chris Christie Turns Personal Experience With Mueller Into a Rebuke of Trump

Trump’s Mueller History Returns to the Political Spotlight

Table of Contents

Trump’s 106,789-Claim Figure Faces a Fact-Check of Its Own as His Record of Falsehoods Comes Under Scrutiny

Trump’s Record Has Already Produced a Remarkable Number of False Claims

The 106,789 Figure Raises More Questions Than Answers

Table of Contents

Stephen King Tells Trump to Forget the UFO Files and Release the Epstein Files Instead

Stephen King Turns UFO Disclosure Into an Epstein Question

Stephen King Keeps Pressure on the Epstein Files Debate

Table of Contents

Pritzker Accuses Republicans of Trying to Rig 2026 Election as Illinois Race Heats Up

Pritzker Turns Up the Heat on Republicans

Election Maps Become the Latest Political Battlefield

Table of Contents

Jon Ossoff Turns Mike Collins’ Social Security Remark Into a Georgia Senate Showdown

Jon Ossoff Faces a Republican Opponent With a Remark That Won’t Disappear

Table of Contents